Now the Counterpunch – Herald Tribune

During the relative drought in information flow since the release last December of two F-18 gun camera videos and disclosure of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, skeptics have rather belatedly suggested a variety of explanations, of varying quality and relevance. Billy Cox applies this analysis to efforts by Ian Goddard and the SETI Institute. While we recently noted some of the miscues committed by Seth Shostak and “sidekick” Molly Bentley, Billy raises weaknesses in the arguments of the “guest talent.” He also underscores a particularly important but under-appreciated point raised by James Oberg, which is implicit in the comments of fellow CSI member Benjamin Radford. (WM)

— Delivered by Feed43 service

Leave a Reply

Your email will not be published. Name and Email fields are required.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>